Demographics details for Alamo, TN vs Willow street, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alamo, TN vs Willow street, PA.
| Data | Alamo | Willow street |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,317 | 9,640 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 52.8 years |
| Median Income | $50,135 | $100,727 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Alamo vs Willow street
- The population in Willow street is higher at 9,640, compared to 2,317 in Alamo.
- The median age in Willow street is higher at 52.8 years, compared to 34.9 years in Alamo.
- Willow street has a higher median income of $100,727, compared to $50,135 in Alamo.
- In Willow street, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 44.0% in Alamo.
- Alamo has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Willow street.
- The unemployment rate in Alamo is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Willow street.
Demographics
Demographics Alamo vs Willow street provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alamo | Willow street |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 2 |
| White | 54 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Alamo vs Willow street
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alamo at 9% compared to 2% in Willow street.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Willow street at 81% compared to 54% in Alamo.
- In Willow street, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Alamo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Alamo at 19% compared to 7% in Willow street.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alamo at 17% compared to 5% in Willow street.
- In Willow street, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Alamo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alamo | Willow street |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 29.6% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 25.9% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alamo vs Willow street
- More residents in Alamo report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 14.8% in Willow street.
- Depression is more prevalent in Alamo at 29.6% compared to 22.3% in Willow street.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Alamo at 25.9% compared to 14.9% in Willow street.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Willow street at 18.7% compared to 14.1% in Alamo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Alamo at 38.9% compared to 32.9% in Willow street.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Willow street at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Alamo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alamo | Willow street |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 0.3% (32) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (577) | 17.8% (1,717) |
| Less than High School | 26.1% (604) | 7.6% (734) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (183) | 36.5% (3,517) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alamo vs Willow street
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Willow street.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 17.8% in Willow street.
- More residents in Alamo have less than a high school education at 26.1% compared to 7.6% in Willow street.
- In Willow street, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 7.9% in Alamo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.