Demographics details for Alamo, TN vs Swainsboro, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alamo, TN vs Swainsboro, GA.
| Data | Alamo | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,317 | 7,583 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $50,135 | $44,491 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Alamo vs Swainsboro
- The population in Swainsboro is higher at 7,583, compared to 2,317 in Alamo.
- Residents in Alamo have a higher median age of 34.9 years compared to 30.1 years in Swainsboro.
- Alamo has a higher median income of $50,135 compared to $44,491 in Swainsboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alamo at 44.0% compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Swainsboro at 24%, compared to 14% in Alamo.
- Swainsboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Alamo.
Demographics
Demographics Alamo vs Swainsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alamo | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 57 |
| White | 54 | 33 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Alamo vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 9% in Alamo.
- Alamo has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Alamo at 1% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Alamo at 19% compared to 4% in Swainsboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alamo at 17% compared to 6% in Swainsboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alamo and Swainsboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alamo | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 29.6% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 25.9% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 42.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alamo vs Swainsboro
- More residents in Alamo report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 18.7% in Swainsboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Alamo at 29.6% compared to 20.6% in Swainsboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Alamo at 25.9% compared to 22.6% in Swainsboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Alamo at 14.1% compared to 13.6% in Swainsboro.
- Swainsboro has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 38.9% in Alamo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Swainsboro at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Alamo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alamo | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 1.9% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (577) | 16.7% (1,264) |
| Less than High School | 26.1% (604) | 11.6% (879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (183) | 6.6% (500) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alamo vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.1% in Alamo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 16.7% in Swainsboro.
- More residents in Alamo have less than a high school education at 26.1% compared to 11.6% in Swainsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.9% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.