Demographics details for Alamo, TN vs Richville, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alamo, TN vs Richville, MN.
| Data | Alamo | Richville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,317 | 77 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 46.5 years |
| Median Income | $50,135 | $68,750 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Alamo vs Richville
- In Alamo, the population is higher at 2,317, compared to 77 in Richville.
- The median age in Richville is higher at 46.5 years, compared to 34.9 years in Alamo.
- Richville has a higher median income of $68,750, compared to $50,135 in Alamo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alamo at 44.0% compared to 23.0% in Richville.
- Alamo has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Richville.
- The unemployment rate in Alamo is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Richville.
Demographics
Demographics Alamo vs Richville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alamo | Richville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | Data is updating |
| White | 54 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 17 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Alamo vs Richville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alamo at 9% compared to 0% in Richville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Richville at 100% compared to 54% in Alamo.
- The Asian population is larger in Alamo at 1% compared to 0% in Richville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Alamo at 19% compared to 0% in Richville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alamo at 17% compared to 0% in Richville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alamo and Richville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alamo | Richville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 29.6% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 25.9% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 20.1% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alamo vs Richville
- More residents in Alamo report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 15.8% in Richville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Alamo at 29.6% compared to 23.8% in Richville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Alamo at 25.9% compared to 19.8% in Richville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richville at 20.1% compared to 14.1% in Alamo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Alamo at 38.9% compared to 38.1% in Richville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richville at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Alamo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alamo | Richville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (577) | 2.6% (2) |
| Less than High School | 26.1% (604) | 13.0% (10) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (183) | 1.3% (1) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alamo vs Richville
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Richville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 2.6% in Richville.
- More residents in Alamo have less than a high school education at 26.1% compared to 13.0% in Richville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.9% compared to 1.3% in Richville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.