Demographics details for Alamo, TN vs Montgomery, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alamo, TN vs Montgomery, NY.
| Data | Alamo | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,317 | 49,623 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $50,135 | $58,033 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Alamo vs Montgomery
- The population in Montgomery is higher at 49,623, compared to 2,317 in Alamo.
- The median age in Montgomery is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 34.9 years in Alamo.
- Montgomery has a higher median income of $58,033, compared to $50,135 in Alamo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alamo at 44.0% compared to 34.0% in Montgomery.
- Alamo has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Montgomery.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Alamo and Montgomery at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Alamo vs Montgomery provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alamo | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 3 |
| White | 54 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Alamo vs Montgomery
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alamo at 9% compared to 3% in Montgomery.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Montgomery at 74% compared to 54% in Alamo.
- Both Alamo and Montgomery have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Alamo at 19% compared to 15% in Montgomery.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alamo at 17% compared to 6% in Montgomery.
- In Montgomery, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Alamo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alamo | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 29.6% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 25.9% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alamo vs Montgomery
- More residents in Alamo report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 16.7% in Montgomery.
- Depression is more prevalent in Alamo at 29.6% compared to 23.2% in Montgomery.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Alamo at 25.9% compared to 20.4% in Montgomery.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Montgomery at 17.8% compared to 14.1% in Alamo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Alamo at 38.9% compared to 35.8% in Montgomery.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Alamo and Montgomery at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alamo | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 1.1% (540) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (577) | 20.6% (10,235) |
| Less than High School | 26.1% (604) | 14.9% (7,375) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (183) | 13.7% (6,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alamo vs Montgomery
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Alamo and Montgomery at 1.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 20.6% in Montgomery.
- More residents in Alamo have less than a high school education at 26.1% compared to 14.9% in Montgomery.
- In Montgomery, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 7.9% in Alamo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.