Demographics details for Alamo, TN vs Madisonville, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alamo, TN vs Madisonville, TX.
Data | Alamo | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,317 | 4,564 |
Median Age | 34.9 years | 38.2 years |
Median Income | $50,135 | $62,135 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Alamo vs Madisonville
- The population in Madisonville is higher at 4,564, compared to 2,317 in Alamo.
- The median age in Madisonville is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 34.9 years in Alamo.
- Madisonville has a higher median income of $62,135, compared to $50,135 in Alamo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alamo at 44.0% compared to 34.0% in Madisonville.
- The poverty level is higher in Madisonville at 15%, compared to 14% in Alamo.
- Madisonville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Alamo.
Demographics
Demographics Alamo vs Madisonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Alamo | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 23 |
White | 54 | 31 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 19 | 36 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Alamo vs Madisonville
- In Madisonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 9% in Alamo.
- Alamo has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 31% in Madisonville.
- Both Alamo and Madisonville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Madisonville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 19% in Alamo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alamo at 17% compared to 9% in Madisonville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alamo and Madisonville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Alamo | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 13.1% |
Depression | 29.6% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 25.9% | 18.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 39.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alamo vs Madisonville
- More residents in Alamo report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 18.1% in Madisonville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Alamo at 29.6% compared to 22.7% in Madisonville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Alamo at 25.9% compared to 18.8% in Madisonville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Madisonville at 16.7% compared to 14.1% in Alamo.
- Madisonville has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 38.9% in Alamo.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Alamo and Madisonville at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Alamo | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 2.3% (106) |
High School Diploma | 24.9% (577) | 13.4% (610) |
Less than High School | 26.1% (604) | 37.0% (1,690) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (183) | 8.6% (394) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alamo vs Madisonville
- In Madisonville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.1% in Alamo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alamo hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 13.4% in Madisonville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Madisonville at 37.0%, compared to 26.1% in Alamo.
- In Madisonville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.6% compared to 7.9% in Alamo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.