Demographics details for Akron, OH vs Markleeville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Akron, OH vs Markleeville, CA.
Data | Akron | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Population | 188,509 | 163 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 64.6 years |
Median Income | $46,596 | $93,333 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 63.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Akron vs Markleeville
- In Akron, the population is higher at 188,509, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
- The median age in Markleeville is higher at 64.6 years, compared to 37.1 years in Akron.
- Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333, compared to $46,596 in Akron.
- In Markleeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 63.0%, compared to 27.0% in Akron.
- Akron has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The unemployment rate in Akron is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.2% in Markleeville.
Demographics
Demographics Akron vs Markleeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Akron | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | Data is updating |
White | 54 | 77 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Akron vs Markleeville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Akron at 30% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Markleeville at 77% compared to 54% in Akron.
- The Asian population is larger in Akron at 5% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- Markleeville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 3% in Akron.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Akron at 8% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Akron and Markleeville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Akron | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 12.0% |
Depression | 25.2% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 25.9% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 48.5% | 30.0% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Akron vs Markleeville
- More residents in Akron report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.3% in Markleeville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Akron at 25.2% compared to 23.0% in Markleeville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Akron at 25.9% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Markleeville at 17.1% compared to 15.7% in Akron.
- Obesity rates are higher in Akron at 48.5% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Akron and Markleeville at 17.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Akron | Markleeville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (3,143) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.9% (37,479) | 19.6% (32) |
Less than High School | 12.6% (23,658) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (29,175) | 35.6% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Akron vs Markleeville
- A higher percentage of residents in Akron have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Akron hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
- More residents in Akron have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
- In Markleeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 15.5% in Akron.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.