Demographics details for Aiken, SC vs Rising city, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aiken, SC vs Rising city, NE.
| Data | Aiken | Rising city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,463 | 354 |
| Median Age | 46.4 years | 44.3 years |
| Median Income | $65,712 | $81,477 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Aiken vs Rising city
- In Aiken, the population is higher at 32,463, compared to 354 in Rising city.
- Residents in Aiken have a higher median age of 46.4 years compared to 44.3 years in Rising city.
- Rising city has a higher median income of $81,477, compared to $65,712 in Aiken.
- In Rising city, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Aiken.
- Aiken has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Rising city.
- The unemployment rate in Aiken is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.7% in Rising city.
Demographics
Demographics Aiken vs Rising city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aiken | Rising city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 36 | Data is updating |
| White | 56 | 98 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aiken vs Rising city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aiken at 36% compared to 0% in Rising city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rising city at 98% compared to 56% in Aiken.
- The Asian population is larger in Aiken at 2% compared to 0% in Rising city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Aiken at 3% compared to 2% in Rising city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Aiken at 3% compared to 0% in Rising city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aiken and Rising city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aiken | Rising city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 16.0% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aiken vs Rising city
- More residents in Aiken report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.5% in Rising city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Aiken at 20.3% compared to 16.0% in Rising city.
- Rising city has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 15.5% in Aiken.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rising city at 23.1% compared to 16.5% in Aiken.
- Rising city has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 35.7% in Aiken.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rising city at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Aiken.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aiken | Rising city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (150) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (4,646) | 19.8% (70) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (2,369) | 9.6% (34) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.6% (9,923) | 7.6% (27) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aiken vs Rising city
- A higher percentage of residents in Aiken have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Rising city.
- In Rising city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 14.3% in Aiken.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rising city at 9.6%, compared to 7.3% in Aiken.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aiken hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 7.6% in Rising city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.