Demographics details for Aiken, SC vs Flint hill, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Aiken, SC vs Flint hill, VA.

Data Aiken Flint hill
Population 32,463 319
Median Age 46.4 years 28.0 years
Median Income $65,712 $39,044
Married Families 38.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 12% 4%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Aiken vs Flint hill

  • In Aiken, the population is higher at 32,463, compared to 319 in Flint hill.
  • Residents in Aiken have a higher median age of 46.4 years compared to 28.0 years in Flint hill.
  • Aiken has a higher median income of $65,712 compared to $39,044 in Flint hill.
  • In Flint hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 38.0% in Aiken.
  • Aiken has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 4% in Flint hill.
  • The unemployment rate in Aiken is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Flint hill.

Demographics

Demographics Aiken vs Flint hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Aiken Flint hill
Black 36 Data is updating
White 56 67
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 26
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Aiken vs Flint hill

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aiken at 36% compared to 0% in Flint hill.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Flint hill at 67% compared to 56% in Aiken.
  • The Asian population is larger in Aiken at 2% compared to 0% in Flint hill.
  • Flint hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 3% in Aiken.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flint hill at 7%, compared to 3% in Aiken.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aiken and Flint hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Aiken Flint hill
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 10.4%
Depression 20.3% 24.0%
Smoking 15.5% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 18.5%
Obesity 35.7% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Aiken vs Flint hill

  • More residents in Aiken report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.5% in Flint hill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Flint hill at 24.0% versus 20.3% in Aiken.
  • Flint hill has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 15.5% in Aiken.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Flint hill at 18.5% compared to 16.5% in Aiken.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Aiken at 35.7% compared to 34.4% in Flint hill.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flint hill at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Aiken.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Aiken Flint hill
No Schooling 0.5% (150) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.3% (4,646) 20.1% (64)
Less than High School 7.3% (2,369) 28.2% (90)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.6% (9,923) 15.7% (50)

Education Levels Comparison: Aiken vs Flint hill

  • A higher percentage of residents in Aiken have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Flint hill.
  • In Flint hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 14.3% in Aiken.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flint hill at 28.2%, compared to 7.3% in Aiken.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Aiken hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 15.7% in Flint hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.