Demographics details for Addyston, OH vs Mendenhall, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Addyston, OH vs Mendenhall, MS.
Data | Addyston | Mendenhall |
---|---|---|
Population | 907 | 2,148 |
Median Age | 29.1 years | 39.0 years |
Median Income | $46,818 | $35,956 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Addyston vs Mendenhall
- The population in Mendenhall is higher at 2,148, compared to 907 in Addyston.
- The median age in Mendenhall is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 29.1 years in Addyston.
- Addyston has a higher median income of $46,818 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- In Mendenhall, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 26.0% in Addyston.
- The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 9% in Addyston.
- Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.5% in Addyston.
Demographics
Demographics Addyston vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Addyston | Mendenhall |
---|---|---|
Black | 16 | 65 |
White | 74 | 34 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Addyston vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 16% in Addyston.
- Addyston has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- Both Addyston and Mendenhall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Addyston at 3% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Addyston at 7% compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Addyston and Mendenhall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Addyston | Mendenhall |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.6% |
Depression | 23.6% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 24.5% |
Binge Drinking | 22.0% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 33.9% | 46.3% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Addyston vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.1% in Addyston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mendenhall at 24.8% versus 23.6% in Addyston.
- Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 19.5% in Addyston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Addyston at 22.0% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
- Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 33.9% in Addyston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 11.0% in Addyston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Addyston | Mendenhall |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (16) |
High School Diploma | 30.3% (275) | 17.9% (385) |
Less than High School | 21.1% (191) | 20.7% (445) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.2% (47) | 18.4% (395) |
Education Levels Comparison: Addyston vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Addyston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Addyston hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
- More residents in Addyston have less than a high school education at 21.1% compared to 20.7% in Mendenhall.
- In Mendenhall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 5.2% in Addyston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.