Demographics details for Addison, IL vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Addison, IL vs Lancaster, CA.
Data | Addison | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
Population | 35,127 | 169,185 |
Median Age | 40.1 years | 33.6 years |
Median Income | $82,547 | $71,367 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Addison vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 35,127 in Addison.
- Residents in Addison have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Addison has a higher median income of $82,547 compared to $71,367 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Addison at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 5% in Addison.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 5.6% in Addison.
Demographics
Demographics Addison vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Addison | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 21 |
White | 32 | 10 |
Asian | 9 | 4 |
Hispanic | 42 | 46 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 18 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Addison vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 4% in Addison.
- Addison has a higher percentage of White residents at 32% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Addison at 9% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 42% in Addison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 12% in Addison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Addison and Lancaster at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Addison | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.5% |
Depression | 17.7% | 17.7% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 32.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Addison vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.2% in Addison.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 17.7%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Addison at 14.9% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Addison at 15.5% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Addison at 35.0% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Addison and Lancaster at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Addison | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (744) | 2.0% (3,403) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (6,671) | 17.5% (29,555) |
Less than High School | 27.2% (9,554) | 21.5% (36,421) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (6,014) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Addison vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in Addison have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 2.0% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Addison hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- More residents in Addison have less than a high school education at 27.2% compared to 21.5% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Addison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.