Demographics details for Addison, AL vs Sylvania, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Addison, AL vs Sylvania, GA.
Data | Addison | Sylvania |
---|---|---|
Population | 669 | 2,602 |
Median Age | 38.4 years | 43.7 years |
Median Income | $47,188 | $36,682 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Addison vs Sylvania
- The population in Sylvania is higher at 2,602, compared to 669 in Addison.
- The median age in Sylvania is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 38.4 years in Addison.
- Addison has a higher median income of $47,188 compared to $36,682 in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Addison at 46.0% compared to 33.0% in Sylvania.
- The poverty level is higher in Sylvania at 18%, compared to 12% in Addison.
- Sylvania has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Addison.
Demographics
Demographics Addison vs Sylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Addison | Sylvania |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 57 |
White | 97 | 40 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Addison vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 0% in Addison.
- Addison has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 40% in Sylvania.
- Both Addison and Sylvania have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Sylvania has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Addison.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Addison at 3% compared to 2% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Addison and Sylvania at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Addison | Sylvania |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 14.4% |
Depression | 26.6% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 38.2% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Addison vs Sylvania
- More residents in Addison report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.9% in Sylvania.
- Depression is more prevalent in Addison at 26.6% compared to 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 21.6% in Addison.
- Binge drinking is more common in Addison at 16.1% compared to 13.6% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 38.2% in Addison.
- Disability percentages are higher in Addison at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Sylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Addison | Sylvania |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (4) | 0.3% (8) |
High School Diploma | 23.8% (159) | 27.1% (704) |
Less than High School | 23.9% (160) | 18.6% (485) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.9% (33) | 10.4% (271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Addison vs Sylvania
- A higher percentage of residents in Addison have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Sylvania.
- In Sylvania, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 23.8% in Addison.
- More residents in Addison have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 18.6% in Sylvania.
- In Sylvania, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 4.9% in Addison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.