Demographics details for Addison, AL vs Meade, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Addison, AL vs Meade, KS.
| Data | Addison | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 669 | 3,897 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $47,188 | $74,063 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Addison vs Meade
- The population in Meade is higher at 3,897, compared to 669 in Addison.
- Residents in Addison have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 37.7 years in Meade.
- Meade has a higher median income of $74,063, compared to $47,188 in Addison.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Addison and Meade at 46.0%.
- Addison has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Meade.
- The unemployment rate in Addison is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.9% in Meade.
Demographics
Demographics Addison vs Meade provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Addison | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 97 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Addison vs Meade
- In Meade, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Addison.
- Addison has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 69% in Meade.
- In Meade, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Addison.
- Meade has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 0% in Addison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meade at 6%, compared to 3% in Addison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Addison and Meade at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Addison | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Addison vs Meade
- More residents in Addison report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 15.8% in Meade.
- Depression is more prevalent in Addison at 26.6% compared to 20.0% in Meade.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Addison at 21.6% compared to 18.2% in Meade.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Meade at 18.8% compared to 16.1% in Addison.
- Meade has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 38.2% in Addison.
- Disability percentages are higher in Addison at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Meade.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Addison | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (4) | 0.2% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (159) | 13.7% (532) |
| Less than High School | 23.9% (160) | 18.0% (701) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.9% (33) | 15.9% (619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Addison vs Meade
- A higher percentage of residents in Addison have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Meade.
- A higher percentage of residents in Addison hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 13.7% in Meade.
- More residents in Addison have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 18.0% in Meade.
- In Meade, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 4.9% in Addison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.