Demographics details for Addison, AL vs Klamath falls, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Addison, AL vs Klamath falls, OR.

Data Addison Klamath falls
Population 669 21,977
Median Age 38.4 years 35.1 years
Median Income $47,188 $46,695
Married Families 46.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 12% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Addison vs Klamath falls

  • The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 669 in Addison.
  • Residents in Addison have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
  • Addison has a higher median income of $47,188 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Addison at 46.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 12% in Addison.
  • Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Addison.

Demographics

Demographics Addison vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Addison Klamath falls
Black Data is updating 1
White 97 69
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 15
Two or More Races 3 11
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Addison vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Addison.
  • Addison has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
  • In Klamath falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Addison.
  • Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Addison.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 3% in Addison.
  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Addison.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Addison Klamath falls
Mental Health Not Good 20.3% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.7% 13.4%
Depression 26.6% 28.4%
Smoking 21.6% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 15.8%
Obesity 38.2% 35.9%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Addison vs Klamath falls

  • More residents in Addison report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 20.2% in Klamath falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 26.6% in Addison.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Addison at 21.6% compared to 19.9% in Klamath falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Addison at 16.1% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Addison at 38.2% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Addison.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Addison Klamath falls
No Schooling 0.6% (4) 0.9% (192)
High School Diploma 23.8% (159) 16.0% (3,508)
Less than High School 23.9% (160) 15.5% (3,401)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.9% (33) 14.4% (3,175)

Education Levels Comparison: Addison vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Addison.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Addison hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
  • More residents in Addison have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 15.5% in Klamath falls.
  • In Klamath falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 4.9% in Addison.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.