Demographics details for Abilene, TX vs Lancaster, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Abilene, TX vs Lancaster, OH.
| Data | Abilene | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 127,385 | 41,174 |
| Median Age | 32.2 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $59,254 | $52,716 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Abilene vs Lancaster
- In Abilene, the population is higher at 127,385, compared to 41,174 in Lancaster.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 32.2 years in Abilene.
- Abilene has a higher median income of $59,254 compared to $52,716 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Abilene at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is identical in both Abilene and Lancaster at 12%.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Abilene.
Demographics
Demographics Abilene vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Abilene | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1 |
| White | 49 | 92 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Abilene vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Abilene at 10% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lancaster at 92% compared to 49% in Abilene.
- The Asian population is larger in Abilene at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Abilene at 27% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Abilene at 12% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Abilene and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Abilene | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 46.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Abilene vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.7% in Abilene.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 26.1% versus 22.8% in Abilene.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 18.2% in Abilene.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Abilene.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 46.7% compared to 35.8% in Abilene.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Abilene.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Abilene | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,096) | 0.3% (125) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (17,400) | 25.5% (10,487) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (17,433) | 10.7% (4,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (20,428) | 13.9% (5,740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Abilene vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in Abilene have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 13.7% in Abilene.
- More residents in Abilene have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 10.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Abilene hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 13.9% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.