Demographics details for Abilene, TX vs Fresno, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Abilene, TX vs Fresno, CA.
| Data | Abilene | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 127,385 | 545,567 |
| Median Age | 32.2 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $59,254 | $63,001 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 6.6 |
Population Comparison: Abilene vs Fresno
- The population in Fresno is higher at 545,567, compared to 127,385 in Abilene.
- Residents in Abilene have a higher median age of 32.2 years compared to 32.1 years in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher median income of $63,001, compared to $59,254 in Abilene.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Abilene at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Fresno at 20%, compared to 12% in Abilene.
- Fresno has a higher unemployment rate at 6.6% compared to 4.0% in Abilene.
Demographics
Demographics Abilene vs Fresno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Abilene | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 7 |
| White | 49 | 10 |
| Asian | 2 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Abilene vs Fresno
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Abilene at 10% compared to 7% in Fresno.
- Abilene has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- In Fresno, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 2% in Abilene.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 27% in Abilene.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fresno at 18%, compared to 12% in Abilene.
- In Fresno, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Abilene.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Abilene | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Abilene vs Fresno
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Abilene and Fresno at 17.7%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Abilene at 22.8% compared to 17.6% in Fresno.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Abilene at 18.2% compared to 15.5% in Fresno.
- Binge drinking is more common in Abilene at 18.3% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Fresno has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 35.8% in Abilene.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fresno at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Abilene.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Abilene | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,096) | 2.8% (15,183) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (17,400) | 11.6% (63,519) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (17,433) | 22.1% (120,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (20,428) | 14.9% (81,421) |
Education Levels Comparison: Abilene vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.9% in Abilene.
- A higher percentage of residents in Abilene hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fresno at 22.1%, compared to 13.7% in Abilene.
- A higher percentage of residents in Abilene hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 14.9% in Fresno.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.