Demographics details for Abilene, TX vs Columbus, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Abilene, TX vs Columbus, MS.
| Data | Abilene | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 127,385 | 23,273 |
| Median Age | 32.2 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $59,254 | $38,954 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Abilene vs Columbus
- In Abilene, the population is higher at 127,385, compared to 23,273 in Columbus.
- The median age in Columbus is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 32.2 years in Abilene.
- Abilene has a higher median income of $59,254 compared to $38,954 in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Abilene at 35.0% compared to 25.0% in Columbus.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbus at 19%, compared to 12% in Abilene.
- The unemployment rate in Abilene is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.8% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics Abilene vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Abilene | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 66 |
| White | 49 | 28 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Abilene vs Columbus
- In Columbus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 10% in Abilene.
- Abilene has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 28% in Columbus.
- Both Abilene and Columbus have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Abilene at 27% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Abilene at 12% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Abilene and Columbus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Abilene | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 44.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Abilene vs Columbus
- More residents in Abilene report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.4% in Columbus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Abilene at 22.8% compared to 20.0% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 18.2% in Abilene.
- Binge drinking is more common in Abilene at 18.3% compared to 11.8% in Columbus.
- Columbus has higher obesity rates at 44.8% compared to 35.8% in Abilene.
- Disability percentages are higher in Abilene at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Abilene | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,096) | 1.1% (260) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (17,400) | 18.4% (4,272) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (17,433) | 11.0% (2,559) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (20,428) | 17.1% (3,971) |
Education Levels Comparison: Abilene vs Columbus
- In Columbus, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Abilene.
- In Columbus, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 13.7% in Abilene.
- More residents in Abilene have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 11.0% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 16.0% in Abilene.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.