Demographics details for Aberdeen, WA vs Ponca city, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, WA vs Ponca city, OK.
| Data | Aberdeen | Ponca city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,113 | 24,340 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,008 | $51,367 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Ponca city
- The population in Ponca city is higher at 24,340, compared to 17,113 in Aberdeen.
- Residents in Aberdeen have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 37.0 years in Ponca city.
- Ponca city has a higher median income of $51,367, compared to $50,008 in Aberdeen.
- In Ponca city, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 29.0% in Aberdeen.
- The poverty level is identical in both Aberdeen and Ponca city at 18%.
- The unemployment rate in Aberdeen is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.4% in Ponca city.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Ponca city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aberdeen | Ponca city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 63 | 67 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 12 |
| American Indian | 2 | 8 |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Ponca city
- In Ponca city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ponca city at 67% compared to 63% in Aberdeen.
- Both Aberdeen and Ponca city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Aberdeen at 21% compared to 9% in Ponca city.
- Both Aberdeen and Ponca city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 12%.
- In Ponca city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 8%, compared to 2% in Aberdeen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aberdeen | Ponca city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 29.4% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Ponca city
- More residents in Aberdeen report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 20.0% in Ponca city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 29.4% compared to 27.0% in Ponca city.
- Ponca city has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 19.2% in Aberdeen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Aberdeen at 16.0% compared to 14.8% in Ponca city.
- Ponca city has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 35.6% in Aberdeen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Ponca city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aberdeen | Ponca city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (261) | 0.2% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (2,683) | 17.0% (4,148) |
| Less than High School | 19.2% (3,285) | 12.0% (2,914) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (1,840) | 12.6% (3,069) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Ponca city
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in Ponca city.
- In Ponca city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Aberdeen.
- More residents in Aberdeen have less than a high school education at 19.2% compared to 12.0% in Ponca city.
- In Ponca city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 10.8% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.