Demographics details for Aberdeen, SD vs Richardson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, SD vs Richardson, TX.
Data | Aberdeen | Richardson |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,210 | 118,802 |
Median Age | 35.6 years | 34.5 years |
Median Income | $62,684 | $94,362 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Richardson
- The population in Richardson is higher at 118,802, compared to 28,210 in Aberdeen.
- Residents in Aberdeen have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362, compared to $62,684 in Aberdeen.
- In Richardson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 36.0% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 2.2% in Aberdeen.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Richardson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Aberdeen | Richardson |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 12 |
White | 79 | 49 |
Asian | 5 | 15 |
Hispanic | 5 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Richardson
- In Richardson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 3% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 49% in Richardson.
- In Richardson, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 5% in Aberdeen.
- Richardson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 5% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richardson at 7%, compared to 4% in Aberdeen.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Aberdeen at 4% compared to 0% in Richardson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Aberdeen | Richardson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 8.9% |
Depression | 17.5% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 16.2% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 37.3% | 28.2% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Richardson
- In Richardson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.0% in Aberdeen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richardson at 20.9% versus 17.5% in Aberdeen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 16.2% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Aberdeen at 20.2% compared to 18.3% in Richardson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aberdeen at 37.3% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Aberdeen | Richardson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (121) | 1.4% (1,646) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (5,127) | 6.8% (8,041) |
Less than High School | 8.0% (2,266) | 8.4% (10,002) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (6,206) | 36.7% (43,584) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Richardson
- In Richardson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richardson at 8.4%, compared to 8.0% in Aberdeen.
- In Richardson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 22.0% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.