Demographics details for Aberdeen, MS vs Wickliffe, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, MS vs Wickliffe, OH.
| Data | Aberdeen | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,848 | 12,610 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,788 | $76,938 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Wickliffe
- The population in Wickliffe is higher at 12,610, compared to 4,848 in Aberdeen.
- The median age in Wickliffe is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 41.5 years in Aberdeen.
- Wickliffe has a higher median income of $76,938, compared to $46,788 in Aberdeen.
- In Wickliffe, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 30.0% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 5% in Wickliffe.
- Wickliffe has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.4% in Aberdeen.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Wickliffe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aberdeen | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 76 | 6 |
| White | 24 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Wickliffe
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aberdeen at 76% compared to 6% in Wickliffe.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wickliffe at 85% compared to 24% in Aberdeen.
- In Wickliffe, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Aberdeen.
- Wickliffe has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wickliffe at 5%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aberdeen and Wickliffe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aberdeen | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Wickliffe
- More residents in Aberdeen report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Wickliffe.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wickliffe at 22.3% versus 20.7% in Aberdeen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 23.1% compared to 18.1% in Wickliffe.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wickliffe at 19.4% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aberdeen at 44.0% compared to 36.7% in Wickliffe.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Wickliffe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aberdeen | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 0.3% (32) |
| High School Diploma | 27.7% (1,341) | 22.8% (2,877) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (822) | 8.3% (1,049) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (424) | 18.5% (2,331) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Wickliffe
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Aberdeen and Wickliffe at 0.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 22.8% in Wickliffe.
- More residents in Aberdeen have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 8.3% in Wickliffe.
- In Wickliffe, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 8.7% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.