Demographics details for Aberdeen, MS vs Soda springs, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, MS vs Soda springs, CA.

Data Aberdeen Soda springs
Population 4,848 54
Median Age 41.5 years 49.0 years
Median Income $46,788 $28,917
Married Families 30.0% Data is updating
Poverty Level 22% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 5.0

Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Soda springs

  • In Aberdeen, the population is higher at 4,848, compared to 54 in Soda springs.
  • The median age in Soda springs is higher at 49.0 years, compared to 41.5 years in Aberdeen.
  • Aberdeen has a higher median income of $46,788 compared to $28,917 in Soda springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Aberdeen at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • Aberdeen has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 10% in Soda springs.
  • Soda springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.4% in Aberdeen.

Demographics

Demographics Aberdeen vs Soda springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Aberdeen Soda springs
Black 76 Data is updating
White 24 30
Asian Data is updating 100
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Soda springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aberdeen at 76% compared to 0% in Soda springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Soda springs at 30% compared to 24% in Aberdeen.
  • In Soda springs, the Asian population stands at 100%, greater than 0% in Aberdeen.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Aberdeen and Soda springs at 0%.
  • Both Aberdeen and Soda springs have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aberdeen and Soda springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Aberdeen Soda springs
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 10.3%
Depression 20.7% 21.4%
Smoking 23.1% 14.9%
Binge Drinking 11.8% 21.1%
Obesity 44.0% 29.7%
Disability Percentage 14.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Soda springs

  • More residents in Aberdeen report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.7% in Soda springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Soda springs at 21.4% versus 20.7% in Aberdeen.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 23.1% compared to 14.9% in Soda springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Soda springs at 21.1% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Aberdeen at 44.0% compared to 29.7% in Soda springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Aberdeen Soda springs
No Schooling 0.3% (16) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 27.7% (1,341) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 17.0% (822) 22.2% (12)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.7% (424) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Soda springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Soda springs at 22.2%, compared to 17.0% in Aberdeen.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.7% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.