Demographics details for Aberdeen, MS vs Rogers, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, MS vs Rogers, MN.

Data Aberdeen Rogers
Population 4,848 13,500
Median Age 41.5 years 37.2 years
Median Income $46,788 $154,611
Married Families 30.0% 48.0%
Poverty Level 22% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 3.2

Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Rogers

  • The population in Rogers is higher at 13,500, compared to 4,848 in Aberdeen.
  • Residents in Aberdeen have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 37.2 years in Rogers.
  • Rogers has a higher median income of $154,611, compared to $46,788 in Aberdeen.
  • In Rogers, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 30.0% in Aberdeen.
  • Aberdeen has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 5% in Rogers.
  • The unemployment rate in Aberdeen is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in Rogers.

Demographics

Demographics Aberdeen vs Rogers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Aberdeen Rogers
Black 76 1
White 24 94
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 1
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Rogers

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aberdeen at 76% compared to 1% in Rogers.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Rogers at 94% compared to 24% in Aberdeen.
  • In Rogers, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Aberdeen.
  • Rogers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rogers at 3%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aberdeen and Rogers at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Aberdeen Rogers
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 6.8%
Depression 20.7% 23.7%
Smoking 23.1% 11.3%
Binge Drinking 11.8% 22.7%
Obesity 44.0% 25.5%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Rogers

  • More residents in Aberdeen report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 13.2% in Rogers.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Rogers at 23.7% versus 20.7% in Aberdeen.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 23.1% compared to 11.3% in Rogers.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rogers at 22.7% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Aberdeen at 44.0% compared to 25.5% in Rogers.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Rogers.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Aberdeen Rogers
No Schooling 0.3% (16) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 27.7% (1,341) 10.5% (1,424)
Less than High School 17.0% (822) 3.3% (449)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.7% (424) 32.2% (4,344)

Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Rogers

  • A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Rogers.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 10.5% in Rogers.
  • More residents in Aberdeen have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 3.3% in Rogers.
  • In Rogers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.2% compared to 8.7% in Aberdeen.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.