Demographics details for Aberdeen, MS vs Moorpark, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, MS vs Moorpark, CA.
| Data | Aberdeen | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,848 | 35,514 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $46,788 | $143,218 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Moorpark
- The population in Moorpark is higher at 35,514, compared to 4,848 in Aberdeen.
- Residents in Aberdeen have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 38.8 years in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218, compared to $46,788 in Aberdeen.
- In Moorpark, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 30.0% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 8% in Moorpark.
- The unemployment rate in Aberdeen is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.1% in Moorpark.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Moorpark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aberdeen | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 76 | 3 |
| White | 24 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 34 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Moorpark
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aberdeen at 76% compared to 3% in Moorpark.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Moorpark at 38% compared to 24% in Aberdeen.
- In Moorpark, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Aberdeen.
- Moorpark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moorpark at 17%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- In Moorpark, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aberdeen | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 9.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 24.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Moorpark
- More residents in Aberdeen report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Depression is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 20.7% compared to 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 23.1% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moorpark at 17.8% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aberdeen at 44.0% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Moorpark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aberdeen | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 0.8% (300) |
| High School Diploma | 27.7% (1,341) | 9.3% (3,304) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (822) | 11.8% (4,201) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (424) | 30.1% (10,699) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Moorpark
- In Moorpark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- More residents in Aberdeen have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 11.8% in Moorpark.
- In Moorpark, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 8.7% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.