Demographics details for Aberdeen, MS vs Manhattan, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, MS vs Manhattan, KS.
| Data | Aberdeen | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,848 | 53,829 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 24.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,788 | $55,316 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Manhattan
- The population in Manhattan is higher at 53,829, compared to 4,848 in Aberdeen.
- Residents in Aberdeen have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 24.7 years in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher median income of $55,316, compared to $46,788 in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Aberdeen at 30.0% compared to 29.0% in Manhattan.
- Aberdeen has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 15% in Manhattan.
- The unemployment rate in Aberdeen is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.8% in Manhattan.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Manhattan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aberdeen | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 76 | 5 |
| White | 24 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Manhattan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aberdeen at 76% compared to 5% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manhattan at 74% compared to 24% in Aberdeen.
- In Manhattan, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Aberdeen.
- Manhattan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Manhattan at 7%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- In Manhattan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aberdeen | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 20.2% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Manhattan
- More residents in Aberdeen report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.7% in Manhattan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 20.7% compared to 20.2% in Manhattan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 23.1% compared to 16.0% in Manhattan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Manhattan at 20.6% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aberdeen at 44.0% compared to 32.2% in Manhattan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Manhattan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aberdeen | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 0.5% (256) |
| High School Diploma | 27.7% (1,341) | 5.8% (3,138) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (822) | 4.2% (2,256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (424) | 26.0% (14,017) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Manhattan
- In Manhattan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 5.8% in Manhattan.
- More residents in Aberdeen have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 4.2% in Manhattan.
- In Manhattan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 8.7% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.