Demographics details for Aberdeen, MS vs Hanford, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, MS vs Hanford, CA.
| Data | Aberdeen | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,848 | 58,470 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,788 | $73,819 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Hanford
- The population in Hanford is higher at 58,470, compared to 4,848 in Aberdeen.
- Residents in Aberdeen have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 32.7 years in Hanford.
- Hanford has a higher median income of $73,819, compared to $46,788 in Aberdeen.
- In Hanford, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 30.0% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 13% in Hanford.
- Hanford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 4.4% in Aberdeen.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Hanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aberdeen | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 76 | 7 |
| White | 24 | 23 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 50 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Hanford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aberdeen at 76% compared to 7% in Hanford.
- Aberdeen has a higher percentage of White residents at 24% compared to 23% in Hanford.
- In Hanford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Aberdeen.
- Hanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanford at 15%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- In Hanford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aberdeen | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 19.4% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 33.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Hanford
- More residents in Aberdeen report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.0% in Hanford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 20.7% compared to 19.4% in Hanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 23.1% compared to 14.0% in Hanford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hanford at 16.4% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aberdeen at 44.0% compared to 33.3% in Hanford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Hanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aberdeen | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 1.7% (991) |
| High School Diploma | 27.7% (1,341) | 14.0% (8,215) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (822) | 21.2% (12,424) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (424) | 11.6% (6,806) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Hanford
- In Hanford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.3% in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 14.0% in Hanford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hanford at 21.2%, compared to 17.0% in Aberdeen.
- In Hanford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 8.7% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.