Demographics details for Aberdeen, MS vs Crossett, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, MS vs Crossett, AR.
| Data | Aberdeen | Crossett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,848 | 4,613 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $46,788 | $41,250 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Crossett
- In Aberdeen, the population is higher at 4,848, compared to 4,613 in Crossett.
- The median age in Crossett is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 41.5 years in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher median income of $46,788 compared to $41,250 in Crossett.
- In Crossett, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 30.0% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 19% in Crossett.
- Crossett has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.4% in Aberdeen.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Crossett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aberdeen | Crossett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 76 | 45 |
| White | 24 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Crossett
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aberdeen at 76% compared to 45% in Crossett.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crossett at 51% compared to 24% in Aberdeen.
- Both Aberdeen and Crossett have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Crossett has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crossett at 2%, compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aberdeen and Crossett at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aberdeen | Crossett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 21.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 25.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 12.6% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Crossett
- In Crossett, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 18.4% in Aberdeen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crossett at 26.2% versus 20.7% in Aberdeen.
- Crossett has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 23.1% in Aberdeen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crossett at 12.6% compared to 11.8% in Aberdeen.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 44.0%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crossett at 27.0% compared to 14.0% in Aberdeen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aberdeen | Crossett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 0.9% (40) |
| High School Diploma | 27.7% (1,341) | 25.8% (1,191) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (822) | 14.2% (653) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (424) | 14.9% (687) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Crossett
- In Crossett, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 25.8% in Crossett.
- More residents in Aberdeen have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 14.2% in Crossett.
- In Crossett, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 8.7% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.