Demographics details for Aberdeen, MD vs Lexington, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, MD vs Lexington, TN.
| Data | Aberdeen | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,859 | 7,952 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $74,555 | $45,877 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Lexington
- In Aberdeen, the population is higher at 16,859, compared to 7,952 in Lexington.
- Residents in Aberdeen have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 36.6 years in Lexington.
- Aberdeen has a higher median income of $74,555 compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Aberdeen at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 13%, compared to 12% in Aberdeen.
- The unemployment rate in Aberdeen is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aberdeen | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 17 |
| White | 52 | 81 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aberdeen at 24% compared to 17% in Lexington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lexington at 81% compared to 52% in Aberdeen.
- The Asian population is larger in Aberdeen at 4% compared to 0% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Aberdeen at 11% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Aberdeen at 9% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aberdeen and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aberdeen | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 21.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 30.4% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 26.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 18.2% in Aberdeen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 30.4% versus 22.2% in Aberdeen.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 19.2% in Aberdeen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 14.4% compared to 14.0% in Aberdeen.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 37.4% in Aberdeen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aberdeen | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (94) | 0.4% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (2,565) | 22.4% (1,783) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (2,349) | 14.6% (1,159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (3,044) | 9.3% (740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 15.2% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 14.6%, compared to 13.9% in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.