Demographics details for Zapata, TX vs Mcminnville, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Zapata, TX vs Mcminnville, OR.
| Data | Zapata | Mcminnville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,849 | 34,530 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $35,061 | $65,318 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 29% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Zapata vs Mcminnville
- The population in Mcminnville is higher at 34,530, compared to 13,849 in Zapata.
- The median age in Mcminnville is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 30.9 years in Zapata.
- Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318, compared to $35,061 in Zapata.
- In Mcminnville, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 28.0% in Zapata.
- Zapata has a higher poverty level at 29% compared to 10% in Mcminnville.
- The unemployment rate in Zapata is higher at 7.2%, compared to 3.9% in Mcminnville.
Demographics
Demographics Zapata vs Mcminnville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Zapata | Mcminnville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | -33 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 95 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 38 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Zapata vs Mcminnville
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Zapata and Mcminnville at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcminnville at 67% compared to -33% in Zapata.
- In Mcminnville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Zapata.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Zapata at 95% compared to 18% in Mcminnville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Zapata at 38% compared to 12% in Mcminnville.
- In Mcminnville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Zapata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Zapata | Mcminnville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 43.8% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Zapata vs Mcminnville
- More residents in Zapata report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.3% in Mcminnville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mcminnville at 27.2% versus 21.3% in Zapata.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Zapata at 18.8% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mcminnville at 17.6% compared to 14.6% in Zapata.
- Obesity rates are higher in Zapata at 43.8% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Zapata and Mcminnville at 17.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Zapata | Mcminnville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (217) | 1.4% (472) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (2,093) | 11.9% (4,114) |
| Less than High School | 39.3% (5,446) | 16.8% (5,808) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (898) | 17.7% (6,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Zapata vs Mcminnville
- A higher percentage of residents in Zapata have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.4% in Mcminnville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Zapata hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
- More residents in Zapata have less than a high school education at 39.3% compared to 16.8% in Mcminnville.
- In Mcminnville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 6.5% in Zapata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.