Demographics details for Young harris, GA vs Edna, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Young harris, GA vs Edna, TX.
| Data | Young harris | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 810 | 6,009 |
| Median Age | 20.4 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $27,500 | $60,361 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Young harris vs Edna
- The population in Edna is higher at 6,009, compared to 810 in Young harris.
- The median age in Edna is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
- Edna has a higher median income of $60,361, compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
- In Edna, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
- The poverty level is identical in both Young harris and Edna at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Young harris is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Edna.
Demographics
Demographics Young harris vs Edna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Young harris | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 12 |
| White | 70 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 38 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Young harris vs Edna
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Young harris at 14% compared to 12% in Edna.
- Young harris has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 41% in Edna.
- Both Young harris and Edna have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Edna has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 38%, compared to 11% in Young harris.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edna at 9%, compared to 3% in Young harris.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Young harris at 2% compared to 0% in Edna.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Young harris | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Young harris vs Edna
- In Edna, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Depression is more prevalent in Young harris at 23.4% compared to 22.8% in Edna.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Young harris at 17.3% compared to 16.8% in Edna.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Edna at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
- Edna has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
- Disability percentages are higher in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Edna.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Young harris | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (2) | 3.0% (182) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (46) | 19.7% (1,186) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (36) | 28.2% (1,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (75) | 8.4% (504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Young harris vs Edna
- In Edna, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
- In Edna, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Edna at 28.2%, compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of residents in Young harris hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 8.4% in Edna.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.