Demographics details for Yadkinville, NC vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yadkinville, NC vs Cambridge, OH.
Data | Yadkinville | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,997 | 9,985 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $41,148 | $39,589 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Yadkinville vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 9,985, compared to 2,997 in Yadkinville.
- Residents in Yadkinville have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Yadkinville has a higher median income of $41,148 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Yadkinville at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 15% in Yadkinville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Yadkinville and Cambridge at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Yadkinville vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yadkinville | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 6 |
White | 60 | 88 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 25 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yadkinville vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yadkinville at 8% compared to 6% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to 60% in Yadkinville.
- Both Yadkinville and Cambridge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yadkinville at 25% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yadkinville at 7% compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yadkinville and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yadkinville | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 20.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 15.1% |
Depression | 23.9% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 26.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 46.4% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yadkinville vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.5% in Yadkinville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 23.9% in Yadkinville.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 17.9% in Yadkinville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yadkinville at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 36.8% in Yadkinville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Yadkinville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yadkinville | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (44) | 0.7% (73) |
High School Diploma | 23.9% (715) | 25.1% (2,502) |
Less than High School | 17.5% (523) | 17.3% (1,732) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (242) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yadkinville vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Yadkinville have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 23.9% in Yadkinville.
- More residents in Yadkinville have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 17.3% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 8.1% in Yadkinville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.