Demographics details for Wyoming, MI vs Sterling, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wyoming, MI vs Sterling, IL.
Data | Wyoming | Sterling |
---|---|---|
Population | 76,726 | 14,566 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $67,234 | $49,007 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Wyoming vs Sterling
- In Wyoming, the population is higher at 76,726, compared to 14,566 in Sterling.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 33.9 years in Wyoming.
- Wyoming has a higher median income of $67,234 compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wyoming at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 11% in Wyoming.
- The unemployment rate in Wyoming is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.2% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Wyoming vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wyoming | Sterling |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 2 |
White | 49 | 56 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 24 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wyoming vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wyoming at 10% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling at 56% compared to 49% in Wyoming.
- The Asian population is larger in Wyoming at 3% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 24% in Wyoming.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wyoming at 13% compared to 12% in Sterling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wyoming and Sterling at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wyoming | Sterling |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.2% |
Depression | 26.2% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 18.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wyoming vs Sterling
- More residents in Wyoming report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wyoming at 26.2% compared to 22.2% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 18.0% in Wyoming.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wyoming at 17.6% compared to 17.4% in Sterling.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 33.5% in Wyoming.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Wyoming.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wyoming | Sterling |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (918) | 1.1% (164) |
High School Diploma | 16.7% (12,843) | 24.1% (3,511) |
Less than High School | 15.0% (11,484) | 13.8% (2,012) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (11,845) | 11.8% (1,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wyoming vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Wyoming have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 16.7% in Wyoming.
- More residents in Wyoming have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 13.8% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wyoming hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.