Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Warner robins, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Warner robins, GA.
Data | Woodstock | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,665 | 82,175 |
Median Age | 36.3 years | 32.4 years |
Median Income | $82,287 | $63,678 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Warner robins
- The population in Warner robins is higher at 82,175, compared to 25,665 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287 compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
- The poverty level is identical in both Woodstock and Warner robins at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Warner robins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodstock | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 40 |
White | 59 | 42 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 23 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodstock | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 13.1% |
Depression | 20.2% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 15.2% | 18.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Warner robins at 22.1% versus 20.2% in Woodstock.
- Warner robins has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Warner robins at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodstock | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 0.4% (335) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 14.9% (12,260) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 7.0% (5,714) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 19.2% (15,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Warner robins
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 19.2% in Warner robins.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.