Demographics details for Woodstock, GA vs Chanhassen, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, GA vs Chanhassen, MN.
| Data | Woodstock | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,350 | 26,224 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $100,913 | $131,633 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Chanhassen
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 37,350, compared to 26,224 in Chanhassen.
- The median age in Chanhassen is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633, compared to $100,913 in Woodstock.
- In Chanhassen, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 4% in Chanhassen.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Woodstock and Chanhassen at 3.4%.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Chanhassen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 1 |
| White | 69 | 84 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Chanhassen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 11% compared to 1% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chanhassen at 84% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- In Chanhassen, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 9% compared to 3% in Chanhassen.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 8% compared to 5% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Chanhassen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 11.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 6.4% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 12.1% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 29.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Chanhassen
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.8% compared to 19.8% in Chanhassen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 12.1% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 30.2% compared to 29.7% in Chanhassen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 9.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (107) | 0.1% (31) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (3,052) | 5.7% (1,502) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,375) | 1.7% (452) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.9% (12,290) | 42.7% (11,186) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Chanhassen
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Chanhassen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 8.2% compared to 5.7% in Chanhassen.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 3.7% compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
- In Chanhassen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 32.9% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.