Demographics details for Woodland, MI vs Chanhassen, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodland, MI vs Chanhassen, MN.
| Data | Woodland | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 423 | 26,224 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $52,188 | $131,633 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Woodland vs Chanhassen
- The population in Chanhassen is higher at 26,224, compared to 423 in Woodland.
- Residents in Woodland have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 40.6 years in Chanhassen.
- Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633, compared to $52,188 in Woodland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodland at 55.0% compared to 47.0% in Chanhassen.
- Woodland has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 4% in Chanhassen.
- Chanhassen has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.2% in Woodland.
Demographics
Demographics Woodland vs Chanhassen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodland | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 96 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodland vs Chanhassen
- In Chanhassen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Woodland.
- Woodland has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 84% in Chanhassen.
- In Chanhassen, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Woodland.
- Chanhassen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Woodland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chanhassen at 5%, compared to 4% in Woodland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodland and Chanhassen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodland | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 11.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 6.4% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 29.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodland vs Chanhassen
- More residents in Woodland report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodland at 25.7% compared to 19.8% in Chanhassen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodland at 20.3% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 18.5% in Woodland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodland at 38.8% compared to 29.7% in Chanhassen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodland at 22.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodland | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (6) | 0.1% (31) |
| High School Diploma | 36.4% (154) | 5.7% (1,502) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (66) | 1.7% (452) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (32) | 42.7% (11,186) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodland vs Chanhassen
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodland have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.1% in Chanhassen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodland hold a high school diploma at 36.4% compared to 5.7% in Chanhassen.
- More residents in Woodland have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
- In Chanhassen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 7.6% in Woodland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.