Demographics details for Woodburn, IA vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodburn, IA vs Fairfield, CA.
| Data | Woodburn | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 138 | 119,338 |
| Median Age | 49.9 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $39,063 | $98,857 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Woodburn vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 138 in Woodburn.
- Residents in Woodburn have a higher median age of 49.9 years compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $39,063 in Woodburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodburn at 49.0% compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.5% in Woodburn.
Demographics
Demographics Woodburn vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodburn | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 15 |
| White | 77 | 23 |
| Asian | 4 | 18 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodburn vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 4% in Woodburn.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodburn at 19% compared to 14% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodburn and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodburn | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodburn vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 14.9% in Woodburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodburn at 18.2% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodburn at 17.3% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodburn at 21.9% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodburn at 38.9% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodburn at 32.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodburn | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1) | 2.1% (2,515) |
| High School Diploma | 36.2% (50) | 13.7% (16,358) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (14) | 14.6% (17,464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (12) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodburn vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Woodburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn hold a high school diploma at 36.2% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 14.6%, compared to 10.1% in Woodburn.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 8.7% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.