Demographics details for Wonder lake, IL vs Auburn, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wonder lake, IL vs Auburn, AL.
Data | Wonder lake | Auburn |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,463 | 80,006 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 25.9 years |
Median Income | $99,844 | $55,509 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Wonder lake vs Auburn
- The population in Auburn is higher at 80,006, compared to 4,463 in Wonder lake.
- Residents in Wonder lake have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Wonder lake has a higher median income of $99,844 compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wonder lake at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Auburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Auburn at 10%, compared to 5% in Wonder lake.
- The unemployment rate in Wonder lake is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Wonder lake vs Auburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wonder lake | Auburn |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 17 |
White | 66 | 69 |
Asian | 1 | 8 |
Hispanic | 22 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wonder lake vs Auburn
- In Auburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Wonder lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Auburn at 69% compared to 66% in Wonder lake.
- In Auburn, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Wonder lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wonder lake at 22% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wonder lake at 11% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wonder lake and Auburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wonder lake | Auburn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 12.0% |
Depression | 20.8% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 31.0% | 38.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wonder lake vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.2% in Wonder lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Auburn at 22.0% versus 20.8% in Wonder lake.
- Auburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 14.6% in Wonder lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wonder lake at 19.0% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Auburn has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 31.0% in Wonder lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wonder lake at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wonder lake | Auburn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (236) |
High School Diploma | 17.7% (789) | 5.3% (4,206) |
Less than High School | 6.0% (266) | 2.5% (1,964) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.4% (554) | 30.7% (24,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wonder lake vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Wonder lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wonder lake hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- More residents in Wonder lake have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 12.4% in Wonder lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.