Demographics details for Wilmington, NC vs Apopka, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wilmington, NC vs Apopka, FL.
| Data | Wilmington | Apopka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 120,324 | 57,017 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $58,908 | $87,394 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Wilmington vs Apopka
- In Wilmington, the population is higher at 120,324, compared to 57,017 in Apopka.
- The median age in Apopka is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 37.6 years in Wilmington.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394, compared to $58,908 in Wilmington.
- In Apopka, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 32.0% in Wilmington.
- Wilmington has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Apopka.
- The unemployment rate in Wilmington is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Apopka.
Demographics
Demographics Wilmington vs Apopka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wilmington | Apopka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 24 |
| White | 71 | 30 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wilmington vs Apopka
- In Apopka, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 16% in Wilmington.
- Wilmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 30% in Apopka.
- In Apopka, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Wilmington.
- Apopka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 7% in Wilmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Apopka at 15%, compared to 5% in Wilmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wilmington and Apopka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wilmington | Apopka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 33.2% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wilmington vs Apopka
- More residents in Wilmington report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wilmington at 25.0% compared to 17.9% in Apopka.
- Apopka has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 16.5% in Wilmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wilmington at 18.5% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wilmington at 33.2% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wilmington at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Apopka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wilmington | Apopka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (560) | 0.9% (499) |
| High School Diploma | 10.5% (12,679) | 13.1% (7,455) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (8,513) | 12.3% (7,016) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.5% (34,319) | 23.4% (13,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wilmington vs Apopka
- In Apopka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Wilmington.
- In Apopka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 10.5% in Wilmington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Apopka at 12.3%, compared to 7.1% in Wilmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wilmington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 23.4% in Apopka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.