Demographics details for Wilmerding, PA vs Kennewick, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wilmerding, PA vs Kennewick, WA.
Data | Wilmerding | Kennewick |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,738 | 84,750 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $36,161 | $70,429 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Wilmerding vs Kennewick
- The population in Kennewick is higher at 84,750, compared to 1,738 in Wilmerding.
- The median age in Kennewick is higher at 35.2 years, compared to 35.1 years in Wilmerding.
- Kennewick has a higher median income of $70,429, compared to $36,161 in Wilmerding.
- In Kennewick, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 26.0% in Wilmerding.
- Wilmerding has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 11% in Kennewick.
- The unemployment rate in Wilmerding is higher at 7.8%, compared to 4.2% in Kennewick.
Demographics
Demographics Wilmerding vs Kennewick provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wilmerding | Kennewick |
---|---|---|
Black | 32 | 2 |
White | 63 | 56 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wilmerding vs Kennewick
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wilmerding at 32% compared to 2% in Kennewick.
- Wilmerding has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 56% in Kennewick.
- In Kennewick, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Wilmerding.
- Kennewick has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 1% in Wilmerding.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kennewick at 10%, compared to 4% in Wilmerding.
- In Kennewick, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Wilmerding.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wilmerding | Kennewick |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 12.5% |
Depression | 26.0% | 26.4% |
Smoking | 29.2% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wilmerding vs Kennewick
- More residents in Wilmerding report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 17.7% in Kennewick.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kennewick at 26.4% versus 26.0% in Wilmerding.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wilmerding at 29.2% compared to 15.8% in Kennewick.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wilmerding at 18.1% compared to 17.1% in Kennewick.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wilmerding at 40.3% compared to 34.1% in Kennewick.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wilmerding at 28.0% compared to 16.0% in Kennewick.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wilmerding | Kennewick |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.0% (70) | 1.4% (1,168) |
High School Diploma | 14.6% (254) | 13.2% (11,198) |
Less than High School | 19.6% (340) | 15.4% (13,049) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (214) | 16.9% (14,348) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wilmerding vs Kennewick
- A higher percentage of residents in Wilmerding have no formal schooling at 4.0% compared to 1.4% in Kennewick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wilmerding hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 13.2% in Kennewick.
- More residents in Wilmerding have less than a high school education at 19.6% compared to 15.4% in Kennewick.
- In Kennewick, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 12.3% in Wilmerding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.