Demographics details for Willimantic, CT vs Folsom, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Willimantic, CT vs Folsom, CA.
| Data | Willimantic | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,762 | 83,269 |
| Median Age | 30.5 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $45,723 | $134,935 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Willimantic vs Folsom
- The population in Folsom is higher at 83,269, compared to 17,762 in Willimantic.
- The median age in Folsom is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 30.5 years in Willimantic.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935, compared to $45,723 in Willimantic.
- In Folsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 22.0% in Willimantic.
- Willimantic has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 7% in Folsom.
- The unemployment rate in Willimantic is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.8% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Willimantic vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Willimantic | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 4 |
| White | 40 | 54 |
| Asian | 2 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Willimantic vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Willimantic at 8% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Folsom at 54% compared to 40% in Willimantic.
- In Folsom, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 2% in Willimantic.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Willimantic at 36% compared to 14% in Folsom.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Willimantic at 14% compared to 10% in Folsom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Willimantic and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Willimantic | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 9.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 28.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Willimantic vs Folsom
- More residents in Willimantic report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Willimantic at 25.4% compared to 17.7% in Folsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Willimantic at 21.0% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 17.8% compared to 15.1% in Willimantic.
- Obesity rates are higher in Willimantic at 41.5% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Willimantic at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Willimantic | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (255) | 0.5% (451) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (2,712) | 7.7% (6,439) |
| Less than High School | 19.4% (3,450) | 6.1% (5,119) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (2,504) | 36.4% (30,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Willimantic vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of residents in Willimantic have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Willimantic hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- More residents in Willimantic have less than a high school education at 19.4% compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 14.1% in Willimantic.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.