Demographics details for Wickenburg, AZ vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wickenburg, AZ vs Fairfield, CA.
Data | Wickenburg | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,920 | 119,338 |
Median Age | 64.4 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $63,301 | $98,857 |
Married Families | 53.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Wickenburg vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 7,920 in Wickenburg.
- Residents in Wickenburg have a higher median age of 64.4 years compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $63,301 in Wickenburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wickenburg at 53.0% compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 10% in Wickenburg.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Wickenburg.
Demographics
Demographics Wickenburg vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wickenburg | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 15 |
White | 88 | 23 |
Asian | 1 | 18 |
Hispanic | 8 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wickenburg vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Wickenburg.
- Wickenburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 1% in Wickenburg.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 8% in Wickenburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 14%, compared to 2% in Wickenburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wickenburg at 1% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wickenburg | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 10.7% |
Depression | 21.6% | 17.7% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 11.9% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wickenburg vs Fairfield
- More residents in Wickenburg report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wickenburg at 21.6% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wickenburg at 16.6% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wickenburg at 18.0% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wickenburg at 31.5% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wickenburg at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wickenburg | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (22) | 2.1% (2,515) |
High School Diploma | 25.7% (2,038) | 13.7% (16,358) |
Less than High School | 10.1% (801) | 14.6% (17,464) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (1,953) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wickenburg vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.3% in Wickenburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wickenburg hold a high school diploma at 25.7% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 14.6%, compared to 10.1% in Wickenburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wickenburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 18.3% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.