Demographics details for Whittier, CA vs Sulphur springs, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Whittier, CA vs Sulphur springs, TX.

Data Whittier Sulphur springs
Population 84,496 16,408
Median Age 37.8 years 39.4 years
Median Income $89,686 $54,950
Married Families 37.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 11% 15%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 4.5

Population Comparison: Whittier vs Sulphur springs

  • In Whittier, the population is higher at 84,496, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
  • The median age in Sulphur springs is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 37.8 years in Whittier.
  • Whittier has a higher median income of $89,686 compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
  • In Sulphur springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Whittier.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sulphur springs at 15%, compared to 11% in Whittier.
  • The unemployment rate in Whittier is higher at 5.6%, compared to 4.5% in Sulphur springs.

Demographics

Demographics Whittier vs Sulphur springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Whittier Sulphur springs
Black 1 14
White 9 63
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 69 17
Two or More Races 14 5
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Whittier vs Sulphur springs

  • In Sulphur springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 1% in Whittier.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur springs at 63% compared to 9% in Whittier.
  • The Asian population is larger in Whittier at 5% compared to 1% in Sulphur springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Whittier at 69% compared to 17% in Sulphur springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Whittier at 14% compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Whittier at 2% compared to 0% in Sulphur springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Whittier Sulphur springs
Mental Health Not Good 14.7% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 13.2%
Depression 15.8% 24.8%
Smoking 9.5% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 17.5%
Obesity 29.3% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Whittier vs Sulphur springs

  • In Sulphur springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.7% in Whittier.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur springs at 24.8% versus 15.8% in Whittier.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 9.5% in Whittier.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Whittier.
  • Sulphur springs has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 29.3% in Whittier.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur springs at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Whittier.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Whittier Sulphur springs
No Schooling 1.7% (1,446) 0.8% (127)
High School Diploma 18.2% (15,370) 18.3% (3,003)
Less than High School 15.3% (12,929) 16.0% (2,628)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (16,519) 13.7% (2,248)

Education Levels Comparison: Whittier vs Sulphur springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Whittier have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Sulphur springs.
  • In Sulphur springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 18.2% in Whittier.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur springs at 16.0%, compared to 15.3% in Whittier.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Whittier hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.