Demographics details for Whitehall, PA vs Mankato, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, PA vs Mankato, MN.
Data | Whitehall | Mankato |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,785 | 45,140 |
Median Age | 44.8 years | 26.5 years |
Median Income | $77,752 | $61,726 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Mankato
- The population in Mankato is higher at 45,140, compared to 14,785 in Whitehall.
- Residents in Whitehall have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 26.5 years in Mankato.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $77,752 compared to $61,726 in Mankato.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Whitehall at 45.0% compared to 28.0% in Mankato.
- The poverty level is higher in Mankato at 10%, compared to 8% in Whitehall.
- The unemployment rate in Whitehall is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in Mankato.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Mankato provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Whitehall | Mankato |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 7 |
White | 78 | 81 |
Asian | 14 | 4 |
Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Mankato
- In Mankato, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 4% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mankato at 81% compared to 78% in Whitehall.
- The Asian population is larger in Whitehall at 14% compared to 4% in Mankato.
- Mankato has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- Both Whitehall and Mankato have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Whitehall and Mankato at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Whitehall | Mankato |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.1% |
Depression | 22.0% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 18.4% |
Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 19.9% |
Obesity | 30.9% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Mankato
- In Mankato, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.5% in Whitehall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mankato at 25.0% versus 22.0% in Whitehall.
- Mankato has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 17.0% in Whitehall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Whitehall at 21.4% compared to 19.9% in Mankato.
- Mankato has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 30.9% in Whitehall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Mankato.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Whitehall | Mankato |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (302) | 0.8% (349) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (2,688) | 9.3% (4,187) |
Less than High School | 7.7% (1,141) | 5.7% (2,556) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (4,603) | 19.6% (8,847) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Mankato
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.8% in Mankato.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 9.3% in Mankato.
- More residents in Whitehall have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 5.7% in Mankato.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 19.6% in Mankato.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.