Demographics details for Whitehall, PA vs Centralia, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, PA vs Centralia, IL.
| Data | Whitehall | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,785 | 11,931 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 40.7 years |
| Median Income | $77,752 | $46,468 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Centralia
- In Whitehall, the population is higher at 14,785, compared to 11,931 in Centralia.
- Residents in Whitehall have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 40.7 years in Centralia.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $77,752 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Whitehall at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 12%, compared to 8% in Whitehall.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Whitehall and Centralia at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Whitehall | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 10 |
| White | 78 | 79 |
| Asian | 14 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Centralia
- In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 4% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Centralia at 79% compared to 78% in Whitehall.
- The Asian population is larger in Whitehall at 14% compared to 2% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 5%, compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Whitehall and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Whitehall | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.5% in Whitehall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 22.0% in Whitehall.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 17.0% in Whitehall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Whitehall at 21.4% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 30.9% in Whitehall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Whitehall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Whitehall | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (302) | 0.6% (72) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (2,688) | 18.8% (2,243) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (1,141) | 13.7% (1,638) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (4,603) | 12.5% (1,494) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.6% in Centralia.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 18.2% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 13.7%, compared to 7.7% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.