Demographics details for White river junction, VT vs Edna, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in White river junction, VT vs Edna, TX.

Data White river junction Edna
Population 2,766 6,009
Median Age 33.5 years 38.3 years
Median Income $66,979 $60,361
Married Families 30.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 17% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.2

Population Comparison: White river junction vs Edna

  • The population in Edna is higher at 6,009, compared to 2,766 in White river junction.
  • The median age in Edna is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 33.5 years in White river junction.
  • White river junction has a higher median income of $66,979 compared to $60,361 in Edna.
  • In Edna, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 30.0% in White river junction.
  • White river junction has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 0% in Edna.
  • Edna has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in White river junction.

Demographics

Demographics White river junction vs Edna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic White river junction Edna
Black Data is updating 12
White 87 41
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 38
Two or More Races 5 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: White river junction vs Edna

  • In Edna, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 0% in White river junction.
  • White river junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 41% in Edna.
  • The Asian population is larger in White river junction at 6% compared to 0% in Edna.
  • Edna has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 38%, compared to 2% in White river junction.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edna at 9%, compared to 5% in White river junction.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both White river junction and Edna at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric White river junction Edna
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 8.9% 12.0%
Depression 29.2% 22.8%
Smoking 13.6% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 17.9%
Obesity 29.5% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: White river junction vs Edna

  • In Edna, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.7% in White river junction.
  • Depression is more prevalent in White river junction at 29.2% compared to 22.8% in Edna.
  • Edna has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 13.6% in White river junction.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Edna at 17.9% compared to 16.3% in White river junction.
  • Edna has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 29.5% in White river junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in White river junction at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Edna.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level White river junction Edna
No Schooling 1.5% (41) 3.0% (182)
High School Diploma 21.1% (583) 19.7% (1,186)
Less than High School 12.5% (347) 28.2% (1,693)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.5% (622) 8.4% (504)

Education Levels Comparison: White river junction vs Edna

  • In Edna, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.5% in White river junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in White river junction hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 19.7% in Edna.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Edna at 28.2%, compared to 12.5% in White river junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in White river junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 8.4% in Edna.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.