Demographics details for White plains, NY vs Azusa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in White plains, NY vs Azusa, CA.
| Data | White plains | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59,316 | 48,824 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 32.8 years |
| Median Income | $109,551 | $81,516 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: White plains vs Azusa
- In White plains, the population is higher at 59,316, compared to 48,824 in Azusa.
- Residents in White plains have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 32.8 years in Azusa.
- White plains has a higher median income of $109,551 compared to $81,516 in Azusa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in White plains at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Azusa.
- The poverty level is higher in Azusa at 12%, compared to 6% in White plains.
- Azusa has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 3.2% in White plains.
Demographics
Demographics White plains vs Azusa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | White plains | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 3 |
| White | 39 | -6 |
| Asian | 8 | 16 |
| Hispanic | 31 | 66 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: White plains vs Azusa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in White plains at 13% compared to 3% in Azusa.
- White plains has a higher percentage of White residents at 39% compared to -6% in Azusa.
- In Azusa, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 8% in White plains.
- Azusa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 31% in White plains.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Azusa at 20%, compared to 9% in White plains.
- In Azusa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in White plains.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | White plains | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 11.7% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 30.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: White plains vs Azusa
- In Azusa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 13.1% in White plains.
- Depression is more prevalent in White plains at 17.7% compared to 15.9% in Azusa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in White plains at 11.7% compared to 11.0% in Azusa.
- Binge drinking is more common in White plains at 15.9% compared to 15.1% in Azusa.
- Azusa has higher obesity rates at 30.3% compared to 28.4% in White plains.
- Disability percentages are higher in White plains at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Azusa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | White plains | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (566) | 2.5% (1,200) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (6,853) | 14.2% (6,920) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (8,744) | 25.2% (12,281) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.0% (23,145) | 17.2% (8,417) |
Education Levels Comparison: White plains vs Azusa
- In Azusa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.0% in White plains.
- In Azusa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 11.6% in White plains.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Azusa at 25.2%, compared to 14.7% in White plains.
- A higher percentage of residents in White plains hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.0% compared to 17.2% in Azusa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.