Demographics details for Westfir, OR vs South san francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Westfir, OR vs South san francisco, CA.

Data Westfir South san francisco
Population 258 63,484
Median Age 39.8 years 42.3 years
Median Income $61,250 $127,062
Married Families 71.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 9% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.6

Population Comparison: Westfir vs South san francisco

  • The population in South san francisco is higher at 63,484, compared to 258 in Westfir.
  • The median age in South san francisco is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 39.8 years in Westfir.
  • South san francisco has a higher median income of $127,062, compared to $61,250 in Westfir.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Westfir at 71.0% compared to 44.0% in South san francisco.
  • Westfir has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in South san francisco.
  • The unemployment rate in Westfir is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.6% in South san francisco.

Demographics

Demographics Westfir vs South san francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Westfir South san francisco
Black Data is updating 2
White 94 11
Asian Data is updating 45
Hispanic 6 30
Two or More Races Data is updating 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Westfir vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Westfir.
  • Westfir has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 11% in South san francisco.
  • In South san francisco, the Asian population stands at 45%, greater than 0% in Westfir.
  • South san francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 6% in Westfir.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South san francisco at 11%, compared to 0% in Westfir.
  • In South san francisco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Westfir.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Westfir South san francisco
Mental Health Not Good 22.6% 12.9%
Physical Health Not Good 16.4% 8.8%
Depression 31.6% 13.7%
Smoking 22.7% 9.3%
Binge Drinking 15.8% 14.5%
Obesity 39.0% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 30.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Westfir vs South san francisco

  • More residents in Westfir report poor mental health at 22.6% compared to 12.9% in South san francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Westfir at 31.6% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Westfir at 22.7% compared to 9.3% in South san francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Westfir at 15.8% compared to 14.5% in South san francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Westfir at 39.0% compared to 21.9% in South san francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Westfir at 30.0% compared to 10.0% in South san francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Westfir South san francisco
No Schooling 0.4% (1) 2.5% (1,583)
High School Diploma 29.8% (77) 13.7% (8,667)
Less than High School 24.8% (64) 14.8% (9,368)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.9% (28) 30.4% (19,273)

Education Levels Comparison: Westfir vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.4% in Westfir.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Westfir hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • More residents in Westfir have less than a high school education at 24.8% compared to 14.8% in South san francisco.
  • In South san francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 10.9% in Westfir.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.