Demographics details for West mifflin, PA vs Kosciusko, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in West mifflin, PA vs Kosciusko, MS.
Data | West mifflin | Kosciusko |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,140 | 6,922 |
Median Age | 45.2 years | 36.2 years |
Median Income | $64,314 | $33,719 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: West mifflin vs Kosciusko
- In West mifflin, the population is higher at 19,140, compared to 6,922 in Kosciusko.
- Residents in West mifflin have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 36.2 years in Kosciusko.
- West mifflin has a higher median income of $64,314 compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in West mifflin at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
- The poverty level is higher in Kosciusko at 22%, compared to 9% in West mifflin.
- Kosciusko has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.2% in West mifflin.
Demographics
Demographics West mifflin vs Kosciusko provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | West mifflin | Kosciusko |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 53 |
White | 82 | 42 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: West mifflin vs Kosciusko
- In Kosciusko, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 11% in West mifflin.
- West mifflin has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 42% in Kosciusko.
- The Asian population is larger in West mifflin at 1% compared to 0% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both West mifflin and Kosciusko at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in West mifflin at 4% compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both West mifflin and Kosciusko at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | West mifflin | Kosciusko |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 16.2% |
Depression | 23.0% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 26.1% |
Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 11.3% |
Obesity | 33.9% | 46.0% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: West mifflin vs Kosciusko
- In Kosciusko, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.0% in West mifflin.
- Depression is more prevalent in West mifflin at 23.0% compared to 22.8% in Kosciusko.
- Kosciusko has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 20.0% in West mifflin.
- Binge drinking is more common in West mifflin at 21.2% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
- Kosciusko has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 33.9% in West mifflin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kosciusko at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in West mifflin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | West mifflin | Kosciusko |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (75) | 0.6% (39) |
High School Diploma | 25.5% (4,884) | 18.4% (1,276) |
Less than High School | 7.2% (1,377) | 9.0% (624) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (3,199) | 12.8% (886) |
Education Levels Comparison: West mifflin vs Kosciusko
- In Kosciusko, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in West mifflin.
- A higher percentage of residents in West mifflin hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 18.4% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kosciusko at 9.0%, compared to 7.2% in West mifflin.
- A higher percentage of residents in West mifflin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 12.8% in Kosciusko.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.