Demographics details for Weaverville, CA vs Maple valley, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Weaverville, CA vs Maple valley, WA.

Data Weaverville Maple valley
Population 3,582 28,220
Median Age 43.9 years 36.4 years
Median Income $49,539 $137,595
Married Families 33.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.7

Population Comparison: Weaverville vs Maple valley

  • The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 3,582 in Weaverville.
  • Residents in Weaverville have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $49,539 in Weaverville.
  • In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 33.0% in Weaverville.
  • Weaverville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Weaverville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.7% in Maple valley.

Demographics

Demographics Weaverville vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Weaverville Maple valley
Black Data is updating 2
White 80 74
Asian 2 11
Hispanic 5 5
Two or More Races 5 8
American Indian 8 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Weaverville vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Weaverville.
  • Weaverville has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
  • In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Weaverville.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Weaverville and Maple valley at 5%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 5% in Weaverville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Weaverville at 8% compared to 0% in Maple valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Weaverville Maple valley
Mental Health Not Good 18.9% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 8.6%
Depression 23.1% 25.8%
Smoking 16.2% 9.4%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 19.6%
Obesity 31.2% 24.3%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Weaverville vs Maple valley

  • More residents in Weaverville report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.9% in Maple valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 23.1% in Weaverville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Weaverville at 16.2% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 17.5% in Weaverville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Weaverville at 31.2% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Weaverville at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Weaverville Maple valley
No Schooling 0.3% (10) 0.4% (103)
High School Diploma 13.3% (477) 10.2% (2,878)
Less than High School 1.8% (64) 3.1% (879)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (658) 28.5% (8,032)

Education Levels Comparison: Weaverville vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Weaverville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Weaverville hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Maple valley at 3.1%, compared to 1.8% in Weaverville.
  • In Maple valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 18.4% in Weaverville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.