Demographics details for Waverly, TN vs Hope mills, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waverly, TN vs Hope mills, NC.

Data Waverly Hope mills
Population 4,297 17,824
Median Age 46.7 years 32.5 years
Median Income $43,750 $57,864
Married Families 35.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Waverly vs Hope mills

  • The population in Hope mills is higher at 17,824, compared to 4,297 in Waverly.
  • Residents in Waverly have a higher median age of 46.7 years compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
  • Hope mills has a higher median income of $57,864, compared to $43,750 in Waverly.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Waverly at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Hope mills.
  • Waverly has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Hope mills.
  • The unemployment rate in Waverly is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Hope mills.

Demographics

Demographics Waverly vs Hope mills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waverly Hope mills
Black 2 34
White 91 35
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 2 15
Two or More Races 5 13
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Waverly vs Hope mills

  • In Hope mills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 2% in Waverly.
  • Waverly has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
  • In Hope mills, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Waverly.
  • Hope mills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 2% in Waverly.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hope mills at 13%, compared to 5% in Waverly.
  • In Hope mills, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Waverly.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waverly Hope mills
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.9% 11.9%
Depression 28.8% 25.9%
Smoking 23.6% 17.5%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 17.6%
Obesity 37.8% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waverly vs Hope mills

  • More residents in Waverly report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Waverly at 28.8% compared to 25.9% in Hope mills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Waverly at 23.6% compared to 17.5% in Hope mills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hope mills at 17.6% compared to 15.6% in Waverly.
  • Hope mills has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 37.8% in Waverly.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Waverly at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Hope mills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waverly Hope mills
No Schooling 1.0% (41) 0.4% (68)
High School Diploma 18.4% (792) 14.7% (2,614)
Less than High School 21.9% (943) 6.9% (1,237)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.5% (709) 13.7% (2,437)

Education Levels Comparison: Waverly vs Hope mills

  • A higher percentage of residents in Waverly have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Hope mills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waverly hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 14.7% in Hope mills.
  • More residents in Waverly have less than a high school education at 21.9% compared to 6.9% in Hope mills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Waverly hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 13.7% in Hope mills.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.