Demographics details for Waverly, MN vs Rockford, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waverly, MN vs Rockford, IL.
| Data | Waverly | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,092 | 146,713 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $108,731 | $50,744 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 7.6 |
Population Comparison: Waverly vs Rockford
- The population in Rockford is higher at 146,713, compared to 2,092 in Waverly.
- The median age in Rockford is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 34.4 years in Waverly.
- Waverly has a higher median income of $108,731 compared to $50,744 in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waverly at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Rockford.
- The poverty level is higher in Rockford at 20%, compared to 5% in Waverly.
- Rockford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 3.2% in Waverly.
Demographics
Demographics Waverly vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waverly | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 22 |
| White | 91 | 46 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waverly vs Rockford
- In Rockford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 1% in Waverly.
- Waverly has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 46% in Rockford.
- In Rockford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Waverly.
- Rockford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 4% in Waverly.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rockford at 9%, compared to 4% in Waverly.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waverly and Rockford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waverly | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 21.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 44.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waverly vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.3% in Waverly.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waverly at 22.6% compared to 21.0% in Rockford.
- Rockford has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 17.7% in Waverly.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waverly at 21.0% compared to 14.8% in Rockford.
- Rockford has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 35.1% in Waverly.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockford at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Waverly.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waverly | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (5) | 1.2% (1,781) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (311) | 16.4% (24,126) |
| Less than High School | 5.0% (104) | 17.1% (25,088) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (268) | 15.5% (22,792) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waverly vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Waverly.
- In Rockford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.4% compared to 14.9% in Waverly.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockford at 17.1%, compared to 5.0% in Waverly.
- In Rockford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 12.8% in Waverly.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.