Demographics details for Wauconda, IL vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wauconda, IL vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Wauconda | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,932 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $108,229 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Wauconda vs Cleburne
- The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 13,932 in Wauconda.
- Residents in Wauconda have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Wauconda has a higher median income of $108,229 compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wauconda at 43.0% compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 8% in Wauconda.
- Cleburne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Wauconda.
Demographics
Demographics Wauconda vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wauconda | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 66 | 52 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wauconda vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Wauconda.
- Wauconda has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- The Asian population is larger in Wauconda at 6% compared to 1% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 18% in Wauconda.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 9% in Wauconda.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Wauconda.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wauconda | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wauconda vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.2% in Wauconda.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cleburne at 23.6% versus 18.8% in Wauconda.
- Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 12.7% in Wauconda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wauconda at 18.8% compared to 17.9% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 31.0% in Wauconda.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleburne at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Wauconda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wauconda | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (202) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,456) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (1,425) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.0% (3,623) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wauconda vs Cleburne
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Wauconda and Cleburne at 1.4%.
- In Cleburne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 10.5% in Wauconda.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 10.2% in Wauconda.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wauconda hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.